Banks Can’t Appear To Service Crypto, Whilst It Goes Mainstream

Throughout the globe, it stays frequent for crypto customers to have their financial institution accounts frozen and transfers blocked, at the same time as institutional adoption rises.

Panos Mekras, co-founder and CEO of blockchain fintech Anodos Labs, started coping with crypto in Greece within the late 2010s. Most Greek banks didn’t permit transfers to crypto exchanges again then. Mekras skilled blocked card funds till one financial institution lastly permitted his transfers, however first, he was questioned to make sure he understood he was interacting with a “dangerous” counterparty.

Mekras advised Cointelegraph that these early rejections are symptomatic of how banks deal with digital belongings as inherently excessive danger. That label typically led to account closures or sudden freezes with out clarification, in the end pushing his enterprise to rely solely on onchain instruments and fee rails.

Public notion of crypto has since developed. Now, crypto is present process a picture refresh, from a speculative asset class to an infrastructure layer for future monetary merchandise. Nonetheless, Mekras stated he nonetheless experiences the identical banking obstacles, as not too long ago as a “few months in the past”:

“I attempted to ship cash from an alternate to Revolut, they usually froze my account for 3 weeks. I had no entry to my [funds] throughout that point.”

The lengthy shadow of crypto debanking

Mekras isn’t the lone crypto holder with such complaints regardless of banks asserting expansions into custody and blockchain initiatives.

A January report from the UK Cryptoasset Enterprise Council discovered that financial institution transfers to exchanges had been being blocked or delayed, with roughly 40% of funds encountering restrictions and 80% of exchanges reporting elevated friction over the previous 12 months.

The council warned that blanket bans and transaction limits are sometimes utilized with out regard to the authorized standing of the alternate.

Revolut is one in all two banks that let each financial institution transfers and debit playing cards within the UK council’s research, and it is usually the platform the place Mekras claims to have skilled his latest account freeze. It operates as a licensed UK financial institution “with restrictions,” which means it’s at the moment increase its banking processes earlier than full launch. It additionally holds a European Union banking license by way of Lithuania and provides crypto buying and selling providers in its app.

A Revolut spokesperson advised Cointelegraph it treats account freezes as a “last-resort” buyer safety measure in compliance with Anti-Cash Laundering (AML) and Know Your Buyer (KYC) rules.

“A short lived freeze might happen if our techniques detect irregular exercise. This might be a mix of some elements, akin to if a buyer interacts with a platform continuously exploited by fraudsters, or we imagine that the funds in query often is the proceeds of crime or sanctions circumvention,” the spokesperson stated.

The consultant added that since Oct. 1, simply 0.7% of Revolut accounts the place clients deposited crypto funds had been restricted or frozen after investigation.

Associated: How Europe’s blockchain sandbox finds innovation in regulation

When banks shut doorways, customers transfer onchain

In some areas, crypto is blocked and leaves customers to extra excessive restrictions. Crypto on- and off-ramps aren’t legally attainable in areas like China, so customers resort to peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms or black markets to commerce crypto.

Whereas China sits on the intense finish of the spectrum, different jurisdictions have eased official and unofficial restrictions. Nigeria as soon as banned crypto and even blocked P2P platforms. Nonetheless, it formally acknowledged digital belongings as securities in 2025.

Associated: Crypto takeaways from Davos: Politics and cash collide

Comparable banking friction patterns additionally emerged within the US. Lawmakers and the trade have invoked the time period “Operation Chokepoint 2.0” to explain the federal regulators’ casual steerage that discouraged banks from sustaining relationships with crypto firms.

The unique “Operation Choke Level” was an initiative wherein enforcement companies had been accused of pressuring banks to chop ties with politically contentious industries akin to payday lenders and firearms sellers.

In January 2025, Donald Trump took workplace because the president of the US and has been pushing for crypto-friendly insurance policies to place the world’s largest economic system because the “crypto capital” of the world.

Crypto debanking points have since been formally acknowledged. In December, the US Workplace of the Comptroller of the Foreign money (OCC) launched its findings on debanking practices by 9 of the nation’s largest banks. The OCC additionally printed an interpretive letter to substantiate that banks might facilitate crypto transactions in a broker-like capability.

Whatever the optimistic momentum, customers nonetheless complain that the banking sector gained’t service accounts uncovered to cryptocurrencies.

“That is nonetheless the case [and] there are nonetheless anti-crypto positions. Some have even stated publicly that they don’t seem to be keen to help crypto exercise or have interaction with the trade,” stated Mekras.

Mekras argued that customers can take into account absolutely detaching from the standard banking system and shifting funds onchain. It sounds viable in principle, however in actuality, most companies and customers nonetheless can not function purely inside crypto with out dependable entry to fiat rails.

Banking’s flip towards blockchain infrastructure

Lately, there was a worldwide shift in how conventional monetary establishments have interaction with crypto.

Main banks and monetary infrastructures are more and more constructing services and products tied to Web3. Within the US, 60% of the highest 25 banks are reportedly providing or planning Bitcoin-related providers, together with custody, buying and selling and advisory options.

Throughout Europe, regulated providers akin to crypto custody and settlement are being launched by legacy exchanges and monetary teams beneath the Markets in Crypto-Belongings Rules (MiCA). Within the UK, HSBC’s blockchain platform was chosen to help pilot issuances of tokenized authorities bonds.

In that backdrop of institutional adoption, some firms working to bridge banks and blockchain declare that the challenges that result in account freezes are linked to tooling gaps and danger frameworks inside banks.

“The issue is that there’s an enormous quantity of friction as a result of conventional banks don’t actually have the interior infrastructure to interpret blockchain knowledge in a approach that matches inside their current danger and compliance frameworks,” Eyal Daskal, CEO of Crymbo — a blockchain infrastructure platform for establishments — advised Cointelegraph.

He described the scenario as one the place banks typically default to precautionary measures as a result of they lack the flexibility to hyperlink onchain exercise with the id and compliance indicators they depend on:

“If crypto is concerned, they block the account and deal with it as out of scope. It’s the best choice for them as a result of they don’t have the instruments to evaluate it correctly.”

Crypto is getting into the monetary mainstream, however for a lot of customers, entry to primary banking nonetheless will depend on whether or not a financial institution’s danger engine can perceive what occurs onchain. Till that hole closes, the trade’s institutional embrace and retail friction might proceed to coexist.

Journal: Bitcoin might take 7 years to improve to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author