4 days after Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Basis proposed merging their operations and activating the long-awaited price change, a X spat between the protocol’s founder and Gary Gensler’s former chief of employees reopened wounds that the crypto trade thought had healed.
The change wasn’t nearly a governance vote, it was a proxy warfare for the way Washington and Web3 bear in mind 2022, and whether or not decentralization was ever greater than regulatory theater.
Amanda Fischer, now at Higher Markets after serving as SEC chief of employees below Gensler, fired first.
On Nov. 14, she posted that Uniswap’s proposal of consolidating Basis operations into the for-profit Labs entity whereas directing protocol charges to UNI token burns, stated:
“This web site is stuffed with posts speaking about Uni’s change to centralization as a result of it was by no means a core philosophical worth however a regulatory defend.”
Inside hours, Hayden Adams responded:
“You tried at hand a centralized monopoly on crypto change within the US to FTX. I constructed the biggest decentralized market on the planet. And he or she says decentralization isn’t certainly one of my values? This crashout is insane lmao. Not all the things you learn on twitter is true Amanda.”
The ghost of SBF’s Washington playbook
Adams’s invocation of FTX wasn’t a rhetorical flourish, however a strategic excavation. In October 2022, one month earlier than his change collapsed, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) printed “Potential Digital Asset Business Requirements,” a coverage framework that endorsed licensing DeFi entrance ends and requiring OFAC sanctions screening.
The proposal triggered instant backlash from builders, who noticed it as a give up disguised as a compromise.
The controversy crystallized in a Bankless episode, the place Erik Voorhees accused SBF of “glorifying OFAC” and undermining the core values of crypto.
Bankman-Fried countered that front-end licensing would protect permissionless code whereas satisfying regulators, a distinction critics discovered meaningless because the interfaces had been how most customers accessed protocols.
Concurrently, SBF turned essentially the most outstanding trade backer of the Digital Commodities Shopper Safety Act, a laws critics labeled the “SBF invoice” as a consequence of its compliance obligations that might successfully ban main DeFi companies.
The invoice died alongside FTX’s implosion, however the episode cemented a story: Bankman-Fried wished regulatory seize favoring centralized exchanges, and Washington was prepared to play alongside.
Fischer’s SEC tenure overlapped with this era. Whereas she has pushed for clear Administrative Process Act rulemaking, her report is unambiguously pro-enforcement.
In Congressional testimony, she argued that crypto can adjust to present securities legal guidelines. A latest evaluation co-authored by Higher Markets criticized the present SEC for “abandoning” its enforcement efforts.
Her philosophical alignment with vigorous regulation makes Adams’s accusation notably charged.
The price change that took 5 years
The unification proposal represents real structural change. Since launching UNI in 2020, Uniswap Labs operated at arm’s size from governance, restricted in the way it may take part in protocol choices.
The price change remained dormant regardless of repeated makes an attempt, every stalled by authorized ambiguity round whether or not activation would remodel UNI right into a safety.
The Nov. 10 proposal, co-authored by Adams, Basis Government Director Devin Walsh, and researcher Kenneth Ng, prompts protocol charges throughout Uniswap v2 and v3 swimming pools, directs proceeds to UNI burns, and instantly destroys 100 million UNI from the treasury.
Labs would additionally stop gathering its personal interface charges, which have generated a cumulative whole of $137 million.
The merger folds Basis operations into Labs, creating “one aligned group” for protocol growth. Critics see centralization as a disadvantage, as fewer entities imply fewer checks.
Supporters view effectivity as a profit, as fewer entities imply quicker execution. UNI surged as much as 50% on the information earlier than settling at $7.06 as of press time.
Fischer’s studying is that decentralization was at all times contingent, maintained when it offered authorized insulation and deserted when financial incentives shifted.
Adams’s learn is that the transfer represents maturation, the place a protocol that survived 5 years of regulatory hostility can lastly align worth creation with governance.
What 2022 really seemed like
The Twister Money sanctions in August 2022 formed the context each events reference. When Treasury’s OFAC sanctioned the mixer protocol, it marked the primary time code itself confronted designation.
The motion pressured each DeFi builder to confront whether or not American customers may legally work together with their protocols and whether or not entrance ends bore legal responsibility.
SBF’s coverage be aware dropped two months later in that precise ambiance. His framework acknowledged the brand new actuality: if regulators may sanction protocols, the struggle over entry turned existential.
His reply, which concerned licensing the interfaces, screening customers, and maintaining code permissionless, struck many as capitulation to the very chokepoint mannequin crypto was designed to avoid.
The choice place, championed by builders like Voorhees and implicitly by Adams, held that any compromise on entry controls recreated TradFi’s gatekeeping in Web3 clothes.
For those who display screen customers on the entrance finish, you’ve already misplaced the permissionless recreation.
Uniswap’s place mattered due to its scale. As the biggest decentralized change, now processing over $150 billion month-to-month and producing practically $3 billion in annualized charges, its compliance posture units trade defaults.
Why this issues now
The present SEC has retreated from crypto enforcement below the brand new administration. Fischer’s Higher Markets evaluation explicitly faults this pullback.
For enforcement advocates, Uniswap’s unification is a victory slipping away after regulatory seize has succeeded.
For Adams and the DeFi neighborhood, the proposal represents earned autonomy after surviving years of hostile oversight that almost labeled UNI as a safety, creating such profound authorized uncertainty that the price change remained dormant regardless of token holders’ needs.
The FTX reference cuts deepest as a result of it reframes the query of who was cooperating with whom. If SBF’s Washington agenda aligned with SEC preferences, then enforcement-minded regulators had been enablers of centralization, not protectors towards it.
Adams constructed permissionless infrastructure; Bankman-Fried lobbied for licensed chokepoints. One has survived regulatory scrutiny and now prompts worth sharing for token holders. The opposite collapsed into fraud.
Their X change crystallized three years of pressure right into a single query: was DeFi’s decentralization actual, or was it at all times contingent on regulatory comfort?
The $800 million token burn and 79% governance approval odds counsel the market has already chosen its reply.
