Bankless co-founder David Hoffman has disclosed how he redeployed capital after promoting ETH, revealing a brand new portfolio tilted towards VVV, NEAR, ZEC, HYPE and LIT. The transfer marks a notable shift for considered one of Ethereum’s most recognizable public advocates and has triggered debate over whether or not Hoffman is rotating into a brand new long-term thesis or chasing a distinct phase of the market.
In a put up on X, Hoffman mentioned he “instantly took ~50% of the capital to VVV, NEAR, ZEC, HYPE” after promoting ETH. The opposite half, he mentioned, was held again for dollar-cost averaging into an asset that had not already moved sharply greater.
“I left the remaining as capital to DCA into one thing not already up multiples,” Hoffman wrote, including that NEAR was an exception as a result of it was “~1.40 on the time.” He then mentioned he had accomplished that second leg of the rotation: “I’ve completed shopping for LIT with that remaining 50%.”
Why Hoffman Selected LIT As Subsequent Main Crypto Guess
The disclosure rapidly shifted right into a broader dialogue about Hoffman’s funding thesis round LIT and Lighter, significantly after Multicoin Capital’s Kyle Samani requested why a consumer would select Lighter over Robinhood. Hoffman framed the reply round product specialization, market construction and auditability somewhat than merely token hypothesis.
Associated Studying
“The simple reply is that Robinhood is an all the pieces platform, and Lighter is very optimized for perps particularly,” Hoffman wrote. “Lighter has extra property, together with extra pre-IPO markets. Lighter doesn’t require KYC enroll, and Robinhood Perps are for under a closed group of customers within the EU.”
He acknowledged one vital constraint: “In contrast, Lighter is VPN blocked within the US.” However Hoffman argued that the deeper distinction is transparency. He pointed to zkLighter, Lighter’s zero-knowledge system, which he mentioned permits finish customers to confirm the trade’s rule enforcement with out permission.
“zkLighter is absolutely auditable by finish customers, so anybody can permissionlessly confirm the trade is following its personal guidelines,” he wrote. “Order matching, funding, threat checks, liquidations and many others are outlined in zk circuits, so Ethereum verifies that they adopted Lighter’s guidelines earlier than accepting state updates. Bullish crypto ethos!”
For Hoffman, the auditability declare is just not merely technical branding. He argued that it goes on to dealer and market-maker belief, as a result of individuals can confirm that “there isn’t a privileged social gathering buying and selling in opposition to customers,” invoking the FTX and Alameda collapse because the related failure mode.
Hoffman additionally emphasised latency and execution price. He claimed Lighter has “one of the best latency of any perp trade” and “one of the best charge construction,” whereas pointing to third-party comparisons in opposition to Hyperliquid. On Robinhood, nonetheless, he was extra cautious, saying he couldn’t choose Robinhood perps instantly as a result of he can not entry them and wouldn’t be capable of audit them in the identical means.
Associated Studying
“Perhaps Robinhood, when it will definitely rolls out perps, additionally has a 0-fee construction too,” he wrote. “However meaning a tie between RH and Lighter, not a RH win.”
The talk additionally uncovered pushback from elements of the Ethereum group. One consumer accused Hoffman of going “from eth maxi to the opposite excessive,” whereas one other urged he had grow to be extra of a short-term dealer. Hoffman rejected each characterizations.
“The expertise beneath all of those property is fairly attention-grabbing too,” he replied to at least one critic. To a different who joked about him having an funding thesis and sticking to it, Hoffman responded: “My final funding thesis I had for eight years. God forbid I get a brand new one!”
Requested instantly about LIT versus HYPE, Hoffman mentioned he views the place as each “beta and alpha” to HYPE. His reasoning centered on relative buybacks, product high quality and regulatory positioning, citing “LIT buybacks” as transferring at “2x the relative velocity of HYPE Buybacks,” alongside what he described as a technically superior product, higher charges, stronger latency and US domicile.
At press time LIT traded at $1.50.
Featured picture created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
